Radeon PRO W7900 vs. RTX A6000A very striking duel, without a doubt, as both graphics cards excel especially in the professional arena. The AMD Radeon Pro W7900, one of the most anticipated graphics cards in the professional arena, is now on sale. For months, the industry has been buzzing with speculation and expectations about what this new GPU could offer. Now that it's finally here, it's the perfect time to compare it to its closest competitor, the NVIDIA RTX A6000, which has been a benchmark in the professional market for a couple of years.
Radeon PRO W7900 vs. RTX A6000: How Much Does Each Cost?
When it comes to investing in a professional graphics card, price is a crucial factor that can tip the balance in favor of one option over another. In this case, the AMD Radeon Pro W7900 is priced at €4950, while its direct competitor, the NVIDIA RTX A6000, has a considerably higher price tag of €6.630. This difference of over €1.600 is significant, especially for professionals or businesses that need to purchase multiple units.
It's clear that AMD has positioned its Radeon Pro W7900 as a more affordable option in the professional graphics card market, without compromising the performance and capabilities users expect from a high-end GPU. On the other hand, the RTX A6000, while an exceptionally powerful graphics card, comes with a price tag that could be a deterrent for some potential buyers.
It is crucial to note that a lower price does not necessarily imply inferior performance.
Radeon PRO W7900 vs. RTX A6000: Specs and Comparison
| Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX-A6000 | ||
| Graphics processor | |||
| GPU name | Navi 31 | GA102 | |
| Variant | Navi 31 | N/A | |
| Architecture | RDNA3.0 | Ampere | |
| Lithography | TSMC 5nm | Samsung 8nm | |
| Transistors | 57.700 million | 28.300 million | |
| Density | 109.1M / mm² | 45.1M / mm² | |
| Die size | 529 mm² | 628 mm² | |
| Chip Package | N/A | BGA-3328 | |
| Conference proceedings | |||
| Quantity | 48 GB | 48 GB | |
| Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 | |
| Bus | 384 bit | 384 bit | |
| Broadband | 864.0 GB / s | 768.0 GB / s | |
| Graphic functions | |||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 | |
| CUDA | N/A | 8.6 | |
| Shader model | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
| General data | |||
| Date of announcement | April 13th 2023 | 5th October 2020 | |
| Availability | 2023 (2nd quarter approx.) | December 15th 2020 | |
| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | Quadro Ampere (Ax000) | |
| Launch price | $3.999 | $4.649 | |
| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Clock speed | |||
| Base | 1855 MHz | 1410 MHz | |
| Boost | 2495 MHz | 1800 MHz | |
| Conference proceedings | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | |
| Design | |||
| Groove | Triple | Double | |
| Long Jump | 280 mm | 267 mm | |
| Ancho Steak: | 110 mm | 112 mm | |
| High jump | 51 mm | N/A | |
| TDP | 295 W | 300 W | |
| Suggested diet | 600 W | 700 W | |
| Fun Dives | Three DisplayPort 2.1 A mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | Four DisplayPort 1.4a | |
| Power supply connector | 2 x 8-pin | 8-pin EPS | |
| Render | |||
| Shaders | 6144 | 10752 | |
| TMUS | 384 | 336 | |
| ROPs | 192 | 112 | |
| Compute Units | 96 | N/A | |
| SM Count | N/A | 84 | |
| RT cores | 96 | 84 | |
| Tensor cores | N/A | 336 | |
| L0 Cache | 64 KB per WGP | N/A | |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB per array | 128 KB per SM | |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB | N/A | |
| Theoretical performance | |||
| Pixel Rate | 479.0 GPixel / s | 201.6 GPixel / s | |
| Texture Rate | 958.1 GTexel / s | 604.8 GTexel / s | |
| FP16 (medium) | 122.6 TFLOPS (2:1) | 38.71 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| FP32 (floating) | 61.32 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS | |
| FP64 (double) | 1.916 TFLOPS (1:32) | 1,210 GFLOPS (1:32) |
When it comes to professional graphics cards, technical specifications are a crucial factor in determining which GPU is best suited for your needs. The AMD Radeon Pro W7900 and the NVIDIA RTX A6000 are two of the most powerful options on the market, but they have notable differences in their features.
Advantages of the AMD Radeon Pro W7900
- Higher Boost Clock: The Radeon Pro W7900 has a Boost Clock of 2495MHz, which is a 39% increase compared to the 1800MHz of the RTX A6000.
- Higher VRAM bandwidth: At 864.0GB/s, it outperforms the RTX A6000 which has 768.0GB/s.
- Lower energy consumption: The Radeon Pro W7900 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 295W, slightly lower than the 300W TDP of the RTX A6000.
Advantages of the NVIDIA RTX A6000
- More rendering cores: The RTX A6000 features 4608 additional rendering cores.
Both graphics cards offer exceptional performance, but each has its own advantages. Choosing between the two will depend on your specific needs, whether you prioritize floating-point performance, memory bandwidth, or power consumption.
Radeon PRO W7900 vs. RTX A6000: Benchmarks
"The new AMD Radeon PRO W7000 Series are the most powerful graphics cards AMD has built to date., providing professionals, creators and artists with exceptional performance and value to power the most demanding professional design and creative applications,” AMD explained through its senior vice president, making it very clear that this new series (which includes the W7900) was defined as a qualitative leap compared to its previous high-performance models.
Benchmarks are an effective way to measure a graphics card's real-world performance in specific scenarios. In this case, the AMD Radeon Pro W7900 and the NVIDIA RTX A6000 show significant differences in their performance tests.
Blender
In the Blender test, the RTX A6000 outperforms the Radeon Pro W7900 by a margin of 52%. The RTX A6000 scored 5559, while the Radeon Pro W7900 remained at 3650. This indicates that the RTX A6000 may be better suited for 3D rendering tasks.
Theoretical Performance in Floating Point Calculations
- FP16 (half): The Radeon Pro W7900 shows an astonishing theoretical performance of 122.6 TFLOPS, surpassing the RTX A216's 38.71 TFLOPS by 6000%.
- FP32 (float): Here too, the Radeon Pro W7900 takes the lead with 61.32 TFLOPS, 58% more than the RTX A38.71's 6000 TFLOPS.
- FP64 (double): The Radeon Pro W7900 continues to lead with 1.916 TFLOPS, 58% more than the RTX A1.21's 6000 TFLOPS.
These differences in benchmarks and theoretical performance suggest that each card has its own strengths. The RTX A6000 appears to be stronger in rendering tasks, while the Radeon Pro W7900 shines in floating-point calculations. The choice between the two will depend on your specific workflow needs.
Radeon PRO W7900 vs. RTX A6000: conclusions
In the world of professional graphics cards, both the AMD Radeon Pro W7900 and the NVIDIA RTX A6000 present themselves as robust options, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. While the Radeon Pro W7900 stands out for its floating-point performance and more affordable price, the RTX A6000 excels in rendering tasks and has a higher number of rendering cores.
The choice between these two powerful GPUs will ultimately depend on your specific needs and the type of tasks you plan to perform. If your workflow involves intensive 3D rendering, the RTX A6000 might be the best option for you. On the other hand, if you're looking for exceptional floating-point performance and a more budget-friendly option, the Radeon Pro W7900 might be your best choice.